Dispatch
Microbiologic Characteristics,
Serologic Responses, and Clinical Manifestations in Severe Acute Respiratory
Syndrome, Taiwan1
Po-Ren Hsueh, * Cheng-Hsiang Hsiao,* Shiou-Hwei Yeh,† Wei-Kung Wang,*
Pei-Jer Chen,* Jin-Town Wang,* Shan-Chwen Chang,* Chuan-Liang Kao,* Pan-Chyr
Yang,* and The SARS Research Group of National Taiwan University College of
Medicine and National Taiwan University Hospital2
*National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University
College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan; and †National Health Research
Institute, Taipei, Taiwan
Suggested
citation for this article:
Hsueh P-R, Hsiao C-H, Yeh S-H, Wang W-K, Chen P-J, Wang J-T, et al. Title
of article. Emerg Infect Dis [serial online] 2003 Sep [date cited].
Available from: URL: http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/EID/vol9no9/03-0367.htm
The genome of one
Taiwanese severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV)
strain (TW1) was 29,729 nt in length. Viral RNA may persist for some time
in patients who seroconvert, and some patients may lack an antibody
response (immunoglobulin G) to SARS-CoV >21 days after illness onset. An
upsurge of antibody response was associated with the aggravation of
respiratory failure.
In November 2002, cases of a life-threatening and highly contagious
febrile respiratory illness of unknown cause were reported from Guangdong
Province in southern China, followed by reports from Vietnam, Hong Kong,
Singapore, Canada, the United States, and other countries (1–4).
This illness was identified as a new clinical entity and designated as
severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in late February 2003. This disease
has a high propensity to spread to healthcare workers and household members
and may cause outbreaks in the community (1–4). Recent
reports have demonstrated that a novel coronavirus, SARS-associated
coronavirus (SARS-CoV), is associated with the pathogenesis of SARS (5–7).
Laboratory diagnostic tests to analyze clinical specimens for SARS-CoV
include reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) specific
for RNA and detection of specific antibody by using indirect fluorescence
antibody and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (8,9).
However, data on the timing and intensity of serologic responses after
illness onset and the association of these responses with clinical
manifestations of the disease are lacking.
In Taiwan, the first case of SARS occurred in a businessman working in
Guangdong who was admitted to National Taiwan University Hospital (NTUH) on
March 8, 2003. As of May 18, 2003, a total of 308 probable cases of SARS
were reported by the Center for Disease Control, Department of Health,
Taiwan (10).
The Study
This study included seven Taiwanese patients, treated at the National
Taiwan University Hospital from March 8 to May 3, 2003, whose illness met
the recent Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and World Health
Organization (WHO) case definition for probable cases of SARS (11,12).
The patients were 26–53 years of age, and six were men. The incubation
period ranged from 2 to 12 days. Of the seven patients, four had recently
returned from China: two patients (patients 1 and 7) from Guangdong Province
and two (patients 5 and 6) from Beijing. In addition, two family members
(patients 2 and 3), and one healthcare worker (patient 4) were from a
cluster, which had household or healthcare contact with a SARS patient, and
two patients (patient 5 and 6) were from another cluster, which had close
contact with a SARS patient in an airplane.
All patients had fever (body temperature >38°C) and dry cough. Other
symptoms included malaise (five patients), myalgia (five patients), and
rigor (four patients). All but one patient (patient 7) had loose stools or
diarrhea 2–10 days after febrile episodes, and five, including the four
cluster A patients, had aggravating diarrhea 9–14 days after febrile
episodes. The mean interval between onset of symptoms and hospitalization
was 7.3 days (range 4–12 days).
Pneumonia developed in all seven patients, acute respiratory distress
syndrome (ARDS) developed in four (patients 1, 2, 3, and 6), and ventilator
support was given 10–12 days after the onset of illness. Pancytopenia
compatible with hemophagocytosis syndrome developed in patient 2. Five
patients (patients 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6) received ribavirin, intravenous
corticosteroid (methylprednisolone, 2 mg/kg/d), and intravenous
immunoglobulin (IVIG, 1 gm/kg/d for 2 days). Interstitial pneumonia
developed in patient 7, who responded well to ribavirin and antibiotic
treatment. All patients survived.
Urinary antigen detection for S. pneumoniae and Legionella
pneumophila serogroup I was negative in all seven patients. Serum from
patient 5 was positive for Mycoplasma pneumoniae immunoglobulin (Ig)
M (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA]) antibody with a fourfold
increase in complement fixation (CF) antibody titer in acute- (<1:40) and
convalescent-phase sera (1:160). An elevated Chlamydia pneumoniae CF
antibody (1:32) but negative reaction for C. pneumoniae IgM (ELISA)
antibody was found in the acute-phase serum sample from patients 1 and 6 and
in the acute- (1:32) and convalescent-phase serum (1:32) samples from
patients 5 and 7. The antibody titers of acute- and convalescent-phase serum
samples for C. pneumoniae, C. trachomatis, C. psittaci, and L.
pneumophila in the other patients showed no significant increase. Five
patients (patients 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6) had elevated CF antibody levels
(³1:16) against parainfluenzavirus 1, 2, or 3. Cultures for influenza virus,
parainfluenzavirus, mumps, respiratory syncytial virus, adenovirus,
enterovirus, herpes simplex virus, varicella-zoster virus, and
cytomegalovirus were negative from various clinical samples of these
patients.
Nucleic acid was extracted from the sputum and serum samples and the
infected Vero E6 cells by using a viral RNA kit (QIAamp, Qiagen Inc.,
Valencia, CA). Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for
SARS-CoV was performed with 3 sets of primers (IN-6 and IN-7; Cor-p-F1 and
Cor-p-R2; and BNIinS and BNIAs) developed by CDC and WHO Network Laboratory.
The RT-PCR products were analyzed, and the unique fragment was cloned and
sequenced (6,11). RT-PCR test results for
SARS-CoV were positive in oropharyngeal swabs from patients 6 and 7; sputum
from patients 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5; and serum specimens from patients 1, 2, 3,
4, 5, and 7. Cultures of all oropharyngeal swabs and serum specimens were
negative.
Cytopathic effects in the Vero E6 cells were first found between day 3
and day 4 after injection of serum specimens from patients 3 and 4. The
initial cytopathic effect was focal, with cell rounding, and was followed by
cell detachment. Similar cytopathic effects developed rapidly (between day 2
and day 3) after subculture.
Ultra-thin sections were prepared for electron microscopy by fixing a
washed infected Vero E6 cell pellet with 2.5% glutaraldehyde and embedding
in Spurr’s resin. The SARS-CoV (range 60–80 nm in diameter) was identified
by electron microscopy (Figure 1 A and B). RT-PCR
from the infected Vero-E6 cells identified the same amplicon. Sequences of
the amplicons from all patients were identical and were also identical to
those from infected Vero E6 cells.
The genome of the SARS-CoV (TW-1) (GenBank accession no., AY291451)
strain from patient 3 was 29,729 nt in length. A comparison of TW1 sequences
to the sequences described previously is summarized in the Table. The number
of nucleotide differences between this TW1 isolate and the Urbani
(AY278741), TOR-2 (AY274119), HKU-39849 (AY278491), and CUHK-W1 (AY278554)
strains was 6, 3, 12, and 10, respectively.
IgG antibody to the SARS-CoV was detected by a standard indirect
fluorescence antibody assay (IFA) with serial serum specimens from the seven
patients. Spot slides for IFA were prepared by applying the suspension mixed
with SARS-CoV–infected Vero E6 cells from one patient (patient 4) and
uninfected cells. Slides were dried and fixed in acetone. The conjugates
used were goat antihuman IgG conjugated to fluorescein isothiocyanate (Organon
Teknika-Cappel, Turnhout, Belgium). The starting dilution of serum specimens
was 1:25 (5). Ten serum samples obtained from 10 pregnant
women during routine prelabor check-ups were used as control sera. Two IVIG
products, one domestic (from Taiwanese donors) and one imported (Bayer,
Leverkusen, Germany), were also tested for the presence of antibody.
All serum samples from the 10 pregnant women and the two IVIG products
were negative for IgG antibody (<1:25) to SARS-CoV. Six patients had
detectable IgG antibody to SARS-CoV during the course of illness, and all of
them had at least fourfold elevation of antibody levels in acute- and
convalescent-phase serum samples (peak levels range 1:400– ³1:1600) (Figure
2). Antibody titers (>1:25) of these six patients could be detected 9–18
days (mean 12.3 days) after the onset of illness. The antibody titer
increased to a plateau 4–10 days after the appearance of antibody. The high
antibody levels might last for 1 to >2 months after onset of illness (Figure
2). One previously healthy patient (patient 7) with positive SARS-CoV
RNA by RT-PCR from both sputum and serum specimens had no detectable
antibody to SARS-CoV in serum specimens obtained 7, 10, 14, and 24 days
after illness onset. Although the antibody levels reached a plateau in all
patients, viral RNA persisted in the serum samples from patients 1 and 2 and
sputum from patients 1 and 4 for 19 to 29 days after onset of their illness.
Although four patients had received ribavirin, corticosteroid, and IVIG
treatment in the early stage of the disease, antibody was detected as early
as 10–12 days after the onset of illness. The peak level of antibody was
1:400 in patients 2 and 6, 1:800 in patient 3, and >1:1600 in patient
1.
Conclusions
Serologic study indicated that the antibody to SARS-CoV appeared as early
as 9 days after disease onset and that a high level of antibody could last
for 1–2 months after disease onset. Previous reports indicated that the mean
time for IgG seroconversion was 20 days and may start as early as 9–10 days.
Our finding supported the results of Peiris et al. (7,12).
Levels and appearance of antibody to SARS-CoV did not seem to be influenced
by the use of ribavirin and immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory agents
(corticosteroid or IVIG, a blood product prepared from the serum of 1,000 to
15,000 donors per batch) (13).
Third, the long-term persistence (19–29 days after illness onset) of
viral RNA in the serum and sputum specimens of the SARS-CoV-specific IgG
seroconverters is an important finding. Prolonged shedding of viral RNA in
respiratory secretions (11 days after illness onset), plasma (up to 9 days),
and stool specimens (25 days) was documented previously (6).
Further studies are needed to determine whether the viable viral particles
existed in body fluids in the presence of high antibody to the virus.
Finally, one SARS patient, who did not have an underlying coexisting
condition and did not receive any immunosuppressive agents during
hospitalization, did not have detectable antibody to SARS-CoV 24 days (>21
days) after illness onset. The serum and sputum RT-PCR for SARS-CoV were
positive in this patient, and the sequence was confirmed. Whether the
patient was anergic to SARS-CoV infection is unknown. A later serum sample
taken in the convalescent stage should be tested to determine whether this
patient subsequently seroconverts (7).
The upsurge of IgG antibody to SARS-CoV and its correlation with the
progression of ARDS, necessitating ventilator support in four of the seven
patients, was evident. Previous study suggested that an overexuberant host
response rather than uncontrolled viral replication, contributed to severe
clinical symptoms and progressive lung damage (12).
Whether the addition of SARS-CoV–specific antibody in SARS patients further
aggravated the preexisting overactive immune-mediated deterioration was
unclear.
High concentrations of viral RNA, up to 100 million molecules per
milliliter, were detected in a sputum sample from an index patient on day 9
(6). In the present series, a physician contracted the
infection from a patient (patient 2) 12 days after the onset of symptoms,
indicating that shedding of the virus from the respiratory tract of
symptomatic SARS patients may last for >12 days. Viral RNA in the
sputum samples of patient 2 collected 12 days after the onset of symptoms
supports this clinical finding.
Dual infection caused by M. pneumoniae and SARS-CoV was found in
patient 5. No evidence of M. pneumoniae infection existed in patient
6 from the same cluster. This finding is similar to a previous report (6).
Four of our patients had elevated IgG antibody titers for C. pneumoniae,
and five had elevated antibody titers against parainfluenzavirus 1, 2, or 3
in acute-phase serum samples without a fourfold rise of titers in
convalescent-phase serum samples. Whether the antibody responses of these
patients reflected past infections from C. pneumoniae,
parainfluenzavirus, or both, or merely a cross-reaction with antibody
against SARS-CoV virus remains unclear.
As of May 16 2003, data of complete genomic sequences for 13 SARS-CoV
strains isolated from Hong Kong, Singapore, China, Canada, Vietnam, and
Taiwan were available in GenBank. The number of nucleotides ranged from
29,705 (SIN2677 strain) to 29,751 (TOR2) (14,15). Since
February 2003, at least three different clusters of SARS outbreaks occurred
in different parts of Taiwan, and five strains were identified from patients
in these clusters. The availability of the sequence data of different
strains in a given geographic area will have an immediate impact on the
effort to trace the origins and transmission of SARS-CoV and develop novel
rapid diagnostic tests and a vaccine.
In summary, analysis of these seven patients with virologically or
serologically documented infections caused by SARS-CoV in Taiwan not only
extended the knowledge of this emerging novel disease but also provided
microbiologic and immunologic clues for the physicians caring for patients
suspected of having this disorder. Viral RNA may persist for some time in
patients who seroconvert, and some patients may lack an antibody response to
SARS-CoV >21 days after illness onset. An upsurge of antibody response is
associated with the aggravation of respiratory failure that required
ventilator support.
Acknowledgments
We are indebted to
many members of the frontline medical and nursing staff and laboratory
personnel of the National Taiwan University Hospital for their management
of these patients. We thank Professor Ding-Shinn Chen for his critical
review and constructive comments on this manuscript.
Dr. Hsueh is an
associate professor in the Departments of Laboratory Medicine and Internal
Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University
College of Medicine. His research interests include mechanisms of
antimicrobial resistance and molecular epidemiology of emerging pathogens.
He is actively involved in a national research program for antimicrobial
drug resistance (Surveillance from Multicenter Antimicrobial Resistance in
Taiwan-SMART) and is a member of the SARS Research Group of National
Taiwan University College of Medicine and National Taiwan University
Hospital.
References
- Tsang KW, Ho PL, Ooi GC, Yee WK, Wang T, Chan-Yeung M, et al.
A cluster of cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong Kong.
N Engl J Med 2003;348:1977–85.
- Lee N, Hui D, Wu A, Chan P, Cameron P, Joynt GM, et al.
A major outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong Kong. N
Engl J Med 2003;348:1986–94.
- Poutanen SM, Low DE, Henry B, Finkelstein S, Rose D, Green K, et al.
Identification of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Canada. N Engl
J Med 2003;348:1995–2005.
- Hon KLE, Leung CW, Cheng WTF, Chan PKS, Chu WCW, Kwan YW, et al.
Clinical presentations and outcome of severe respiratory distress syndrome
in children. Lancet April 29, 2003. Available from: URL:
http//image.thelancet.com/extras/031et4127web
- Ksiazek TG, Erdman D, Goldsmith C, Zaki SR, Peret T, Emery S, et al:
A novel coronavirus associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome.
N Engl J Med 2003;348:1953–66.
- Drosten C, Gunther S, Preiser W, van der Werf S, Brodt HR, Becker S,
et al.
Identification of a novel coronavirus in patients with severe acute
respiratory syndrome. N Engl J Med 2003;348:1967–76.
- Peiris JSM, Lai ST, Poon LLM, Guan Y, Yam LYC, Lim W, et al.
Coronavirus as a possible cause of severe acute respiratory syndrome.
Lancet 2003;361:1319–25.
- World Health Organization: case definition for surveillance of severe
acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). Geneva: 1 May 2003. Available from:
URL:
http://www.who.int/csr/sars/casedefinition/en/
- Updated interim U.S. surveillance case definition for Severe acute
respiratory syndrome (SARS)-United States [accessed April 30, 2003. 2003].
Available from: URL:
http://www.cdc.gov/od/oc/media/pressrel/r030430.htm
- World Health Organization. Cumulative number of reported probable
cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) [accessed May 16 2003].
Available from:
http://www.who.int/csr/sarscountry/2003_05_16/en/
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. SARS coronavirus
sequencing. 2003 Available from: URL:
http://www.cdc.gov.ncidod/sars/sequence.htm
- Peiris JSM, Chu CM, Cheng VCC, Chan KS, Hung IFN, Poon LLM, et al.
Clinical progression and viral load in a community outbreak of coronavirus-associated
SARS pneumonia: a prospective study. Lancet 2003 May 9; [epub ahead of
print] Available from: URL:
http://image/thelancet.com/extras/03art4432web.pdf
- Sewell WAC, Jolles S.
Immunomodulatory action of intravenous immunoglobulin. Immunology
2002;107:387–93.
- Rota PA, Oberste MS, Monroe S, Allan Nix W, Campagnoli R, Icenogle JP,
et al. Characterization of a novel coronavirus associated with severe
acute respiratory syndrome. Science [accessed May 1 2003]. Available from:
URL:
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/short/300/5624/1394
- Marra MA, Jones SJM, Astell CR, Holt RA, Brooke-Wilson A, Butterfield
YSN, et al. The genome sequence of the SARS-associated coronavirus.
Science [accessed May 1 2003]. Available from: URL:
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/short/300/5624/1399
| Table. Nucleotide
base differences among the TW-1, TOR-2, HKU-39849, CUHK-W1, and the
Urbani sequences of SARS-CoVa |
|
| SARS-associated
coronavirus sequence |
|
| Base |
TW-1 |
TOR-2 |
HKU-39849 |
CUHK-W1 |
Urbani |
A. a. changeb |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
TW1/Urbani |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2,601 |
T |
T |
C |
T |
T |
Val/Val |
| 3,165 |
G |
A |
A |
A |
A |
Ser/Ser |
| 7,746 |
G |
G |
T |
T |
G |
Pro/Pro |
| 7,919 |
C |
C |
C |
C |
T |
Ala/Val |
| 9,404 |
T |
T |
C |
C |
T |
Val/Ala |
| 9,479 |
T |
T |
C |
C |
T |
Val/Ala |
| 16,622 |
C |
C |
C |
C |
T |
Ala/Ala |
| 17,564 |
T |
T |
G |
G |
T |
Asp/Glu |
| 17,846 |
C |
C |
T |
T |
C |
Arg/Arg |
| 19,064 |
A |
A |
G |
G |
G |
Glu/Glu |
| 21,721 |
G |
G |
A |
A |
G |
Gly/Asp |
| 22,222 |
T |
T |
C |
C |
T |
Ile/Thr |
| 23,220 |
T |
G |
T |
T |
T |
Ser/Ala |
| 24,872 |
T |
T |
T |
T |
C |
Leu/Leu |
| 25,298 |
G |
A |
G |
G |
G |
Gly/Arg |
| 26867 |
T |
T |
T |
T |
C |
Ser/Pro |
| 27,827 |
T |
T |
C |
C |
T |
Cys/Arg |
|
| aSARS, severe
acute respiratory syndrome. |
| bIndicates a base
difference resulting in an amino acid change. |
1The first and the second author contributed equally to this
paper.
2The SARS Research Group of National Taiwan University College
of Medicine and National Taiwan University Hospital includes the following:
Ding-Shinn Chen, Yuan-Teh Lee, Che-Ming Teng, Pan-Chyr Yang, Hong-Nerng Ho,
Pei-Jer Chen, Ming-Fu Chang, Jin-Town Wang, Shan-Chwen Chang, Chuan-Liang
Kao, Wei-Kung Wang, Cheng-Hsiang Hsiao, and Po-Ren Hsueh. |