Introduction
new challenges for the health professional
Diagnostic Quick Reference
a Cross-reference from symptoms to pertinent sections of this booklet
Diagnostic Checklist
additional questions for use in patient intake and medical history
Environmental
Tobacco Smoke (ETS)
impacts on both adults and children; EPA risk assessment findings
Other Combustion Products
carbon monoxide poisoning, often misdiagnosed as cold or flu;
respiratory impact of pollutants from misuse of malfunctioning combustion
devices
- Carbon Monoxide (CO)
- Nitrogen dioxide and Sulfur dioxide
Animal Dander, Molds, Dust
Mites, Other Biologicals
a contributing factor in building-related health complaints
- Tuberculosis
- Legionnaires Disease
- Allergic Reactions
- Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis
- Humidifer Fever
- Mycotoxins
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
common household and office products are frequent sources
- Formaldehyde
- Pesticides
Heavy Metals: Airborne Lead and
Mercury Vapors
lead dust from old paint; mercury exposure from some paints and certain
religious uses
- Airborne Lead
- Mercury Vapor
Sick Building Syndrome (SBS)
what is it; what it isn't; what health care professionals can do
Two Long-Term Risks: Asbestos
and Radon
two highly publicized carcinogens in the indoor environment
- Asbestos
- Radon
Questions That May Be Asked
current views on multiple chemical sensitivity, clinical ecologists,
ionizers and air cleaners, duct cleaning, carpets and plants
- What is "multiple chemical sensitivity" or
"total allergy"?
- Who are "clinical ecologists"?
- What are ionizers and other ozone generating air
cleaners?
- Can other air cleaners help?
- Should I have my ducts cleaned?
- Can carpet make people sick?
- Can plants control indoor air pollution?
For Assistance and
Additional Information
resources for both health professionals and patients
References
Indoor air pollution poses many challenges to the health
professional. This booklet offers an overview of those challenges,
focusing on acute conditions, with patterns that point to particular
agents and suggestions for appropriate remedial action.
The individual presenting with environmentally associated
symptoms is apt to have been exposed to airborne substances originating
not outdoors, but indoors. Studies from the United States and Europe show
that persons in industrialized nations spend more than 90 percent of their
time indoors1. For infants, the elderly, persons with chronic
diseases, and most urban residents of any age, the proportion is probably
higher. In addition, the concentrations of many pollutants indoors exceed
those outdoors. The locations of highest concern are those involving
prolonged, continuing exposure - that is, the home, school, and workplace.
The lung is the most common site of injury by airborne
pollutants. Acute effects, however, may also include non-respiratory signs
and symptoms, which may depend upon toxicological characteristics of the
substances and host-related factors.
Heavy industry-related occupational hazards are generally
regulated and likely to be dealt with by an on-site or company physician
or other health personnel2. This booklet addresses the indoor
air pollution problems that may be caused by contaminants encountered in
the daily lives of persons in their homes and offices. These are the
problems more likely to be encountered by the primary health care
provider.
Etiology can be difficult to establish because many signs
and symptoms are nonspecific, making differential diagnosis a distinct
challenge. Indeed, multiple pollutants may be involved. The challenge is
further compounded by the similar manifestations of many of the pollutants
and by the similarity of those effects, in turn, to those that may be
associated with allergies, influenza, and the common cold. Many effects
may also be associated, independently or in combination with, stress, work
pressures, and seasonal discomforts.
Because a few prominent aspects of indoor air pollution,
notably environmental tobacco smoke
and "sick building syndrome," have been
brought to public attention, individuals may volunteer suggestions of a
connection between respiratory or other symptoms and conditions in the
home or, especially, the workplace. Such suggestions should be seriously
considered and pursued, with the caution that such attention could also
lead to inaccurate attribution of effects. Questions listed in the
diagnostic leads sections will help determine the cause of the health
problem. The probability of an etiological association increases if the
individual can convincingly relate the disappearance or lessening of
symptoms to being away from the home or workplace.
The health professional should use this booklet as a tool
in diagnosing an individual's signs and symptoms that could be related to
an indoor air pollution problem. The document is organized according to
pollutant or pollutant group. Key signs and symptoms from exposure to the
pollutant(s) are listed, with diagnostic leads to help determine the cause
of the health problem. A quick reference summary
of this information is included in this booklet. Remedial action is
suggested, with comment providing more detailed information in each
section. References for information included in each section are listed at
the end of this document.
It must be noted that some of the signs and symptoms noted
in the text may occur only in association with significant exposures, and
that effects of lower exposures may be milder and more vague,
unfortunately underscoring the diagnostic challenge. Further, signs and
symptoms in infants and children may be atypical (some such departures
have been specifically noted).
The reader is cautioned that this is not an all-inclusive
reference, but a necessarily selective survey intended to suggest the
scope of the problem. A detailed medical history is essential, and the diagnostic
checklist may be helpful in this regard. Resolving the problem may
sometimes require a multi-disciplinary approach, enlisting the advice and
assistance of others outside the medical profession. The
references cited throughout and the For
Assistance and Additional Information section will provide the reader
with additional information.
|
Signs and Symptoms |
Environmental
Tobacco Smoke |
Other
Combustion Products |
Biological
Pollutants |
Volatile Organics |
Heavy
Metals |
Sick Building
Syndrome |
|
RESPIRATORY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Rhinitis, nasal congestion |
YES |
YES |
YES |
YES |
NO |
YES |
| Epistaxis |
NO |
NO |
NO |
YES1 |
NO |
NO |
| Pharyngitis, cough |
YES |
YES |
YES |
YES |
NO |
YES |
| Wheezing, worsening asthma |
YES |
YES |
NO |
YES |
NO |
YES |
| Dyspnea |
YES2 |
NO |
YES |
NO |
NO |
YES |
| Severe lung disease |
NO |
NO |
NO |
NO |
NO |
YES3 |
|
OTHER |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Conjunctival irritation |
YES |
YES |
YES |
YES |
NO |
YES |
| Headache or dizziness |
YES |
YES |
YES |
YES |
YES |
YES |
| Lethargy, fatigue, malaise |
NO |
YES4 |
YES5 |
YES |
YES |
YES |
| Nausea, vomiting, anorexia |
NO |
YES4 |
YES |
YES |
YES |
NO |
| Cognitive impairment, personality
change |
NO |
YES4 |
NO |
YES |
YES |
YES |
| Rashes |
NO |
NO |
YES |
YES |
YES |
NO |
| Fever, chills |
NO |
NO |
YES6 |
NO |
YES |
NO |
| Tachycardia |
NO |
YES4 |
NO |
NO |
YES |
NO |
| Retinal hemorrhage |
NO |
YES4 |
NO |
NO |
NO |
NO |
| Myalgia |
NO |
NO |
NO |
YES5 |
NO |
YES |
| Hearing loss |
NO |
NO |
NO |
YES |
NO |
NO |
- Associated especially with formaldehyde.
- In asthma.
- Hypersensitivity pneumonitis, Legionnaires' Disease.
- Particularly associated with high CO levels.
- Hypersensitivity pneumonitis, humidifier fever.
- With marked hypersensitivity reactions and Legionnaires' Disease.
Particular Effects Seen in Infants and Children
Environmental Tobacco Smoke:
frequent upper
respiratory infections, otitis media; persistent middle-ear effusion;
asthma onset, increased severity; recurrent pneumonia, bronchitis.
Acute Lead Toxicity: irritability, abdominal pain,
ataxia, seizures, loss of consciousness.
It is vital that the individual and the health care
professional comprise a cooperative diagnostic team in analyzing diurnal
and other patterns that may provide clues to a complaint's link with
indoor air pollution. A diary or log of symptoms correlated with time and
place may prove helpful. If an association between symptoms and events or
conditions in the home or workplace is not volunteered by the individual,
answers to the following questions may be useful, together with the
medical history.
The health care professional can investigate further by
matching the individual's signs and symptoms to those pollutants with
which they may be associated, as detailed in the discussions of various
pollutant categories.
- When did the [symptom or complaint] begin?
- Does the [symptom or complaint] exist all the time, or does it come
and go? That is, is it associated with times of day, days of the week,
or seasons of the year?
- (If so) Are you usually in a particular place at those times?
- Does the problem abate or cease, either immediately or gradually,
when you leave there? Does it recur when you return?
- What is your work? Have you recently changed employers or
assignments, or has your employer recently changed location?
- (If not) Has the place where you work been redecorated or
refurnished, or have you recently started working with new or
different materials or equipment? (These may include pesticides,
cleaning products, craft supplies, et al.)
- What is the smoking policy at your workplace? Are you exposed to
environmental tobacco smoke at work, school, home, etc.?
- Describe your work area.
- Have you recently changed your place of residence?
- (If not) Have you made any recent changes in, or additions to, your
home?
- Have you, or has anyone else in your family, recently started a new
hobby or other activity?
- Have you recently acquired a new pet?
- Does anyone else in your home have a similar problem? How about
anyone with whom you work? (An affirmative reply may suggest either a
common source or a communicable condition.)
NOTE: A more detailed exposure history form, developed by
the U.S. Public Health Service's Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease
Registry (ATSDR) in conjunction with the National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health, is available from: Allen Jansen, ATSDR,
1600 Clifton Road, N.E., Mail Drop E33, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, (404)
639-6205. Request "Case Studies in Environmental Medicine #26:
Taking an Exposure History." Continuing Medical Education Credit
is available in conjunction with this monograph.
Key Signs/Symptoms in Adults ...
- rhinitis/pharyngitis, nasal congestion, persistent cough
- conjunctival irritation
- headache
- wheezing (bronchial constriction)
- exacerbation of chronic respiratory conditions
... and in Infants and Children
- asthma onset
- increased severity of, or difficulty in controlling, asthma
- frequent upper respiratory infections and/or episodes of otitis
media
- persistent middle-ear effusion
- snoring
- repeated pneumonia, bronchitis
Diagnostic Leads
- Is individual exposed to environmental tobacco smoke on a regular
basis?
- Test urine of infants and small children for cotinine, a biomarker
for nicotine
Remedial Action
While improved general ventilation of indoor spaces may
decrease the odor of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS), health risks
cannot be eliminated by generally accepted ventilation methods. Research
has led to the conclusion that total removal of tobacco smoke - a complex
mixture of gaseous and particulate components - through general
ventilation is not feasible.3
The most effective solution is to eliminate all smoking
from the individual's environment, either through smoking prohibitions or
by restricting smoking to properly designed smoking rooms. These rooms
should be separately ventilated to the outside.4
Some higher efficiency air cleaning systems, under select
conditions, can remove some tobacco smoke particles. Most air cleaners,
including the popular desk-top models, however, cannot remove the gaseous
pollutants from this source. And while some air cleaners are designed to
remove specific gaseous pollutants, none is expected to remove all of them
and should not be relied upon to do so. (For further comment, see Questions
That May Be Asked - Can Other Air Cleaners Help?)
Comment
Environmental tobacco smoke is a major source of indoor
air contaminants. The ubiquitous nature of ETS in indoor environments
indicates that some unintentional inhalation of ETS by nonsmokers is
unavoidable. Environmental tobacco smoke is a dynamic, complex mixture of
more than 4,000 chemicals found in both vapor and particle phases. Many of
these chemicals are known toxic or carcinogenic agents. Nonsmoker exposure
to ETS-related toxic and carcinogenic substances will occur in indoor
spaces where there is smoking.
All the compounds found in "mainstream" smoke,
the smoke inhaled by the active smoker, are also found in "sidestream"
smoke, the emission from the burning end of the cigarette, cigar, or pipe.
ETS consists of both sidestream smoke and exhaled mainstream smoke.
Inhalation of ETS is often termed "secondhand smoking",
"passive smoking", or "involuntary smoking."
The role of exposure to tobacco smoke via active smoking
as a cause of lung and other cancers, emphysema and other chronic
obstructive pulmonary diseases, and cardiovascular and other diseases in
adults has been firmly established.5,6,7 Smokers, however, are
not the only ones affected.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has
classified ETS as a known human (Group A) carcinogen and estimates that it
is responsible for approximately 3,000 lung cancer deaths per year among
nonsmokers in the United States.8 The U.S. Surgeon General, the
National Research Council, and the National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health also concluded that passive smoking can cause lung
cancer in otherwise healthy adults who never smoked.9,10,11
Children's lungs are even more susceptible to harmful
effects from ETS. In infants and young children up to three years,
exposure to ETS causes an approximate doubling in the incidence of
pneumonia, bronchitis, and bronchiolitis. There is also strong evidence of
increased middle ear effusion, reduced lung function, and reduced lung
growth. Several recent studies link ETS with increased incidence and
prevalence of asthma and increased severity of asthmatic symptoms in
children of mothers who smoke heavily. These respiratory illnesses in
childhood may very well contribute to the small but significant lung
function reductions associated with exposure to ETS in adults. The adverse
health effects of ETS, especially in children, correlate with the amount
of smoking in the home and are often more prevalent when both parents
smoke.12
The connection of children's symptoms with ETS may not be
immediately evident to the clinician and may become apparent only after
careful questioning. Measurement of biochemical markers such as cotinine
(a metabolic nicotine derivative) in body fluids (ordinarily urine) can
provide evidence of a child's exposure to ETS.13
The impact of maternal smoking on fetal development has
also been well documented. Maternal smoking is also associated with
increased incidence of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome, although it has not
been determined to what extent this increase is due to in utero
versus postnatal (lactational and ETS) exposure.14
Airborne particulate matter contained in ETS has been
associated with impaired breathing, lung diseases, aggravation of existing
respiratory and cardiovascular disease, changes to the body's immune
system, and lowered defenses against inhaled particles.15 For
direct ETS exposure, measurable annoyance, irritation, and adverse health
effects have been demonstrated in nonsmokers, children and spouses in
particular, who spend significant time in the presence of smokers.16,17
Acute cardiovascular effects of ETS include increased heart rate, blood
pressure, blood carboxyhemoglobin; and related reduction in exercise
capacity in those with stable angina and in healthy people. Studies have
also found increased incidence of nonfatal heart disease among nonsmokers
exposed to ETS, and it is thought likely that ETS increases the risk of
peripheral vascular disease, as well.18
Health Problems Caused By
OTHER COMBUSTION PRODUCTS
(Stoves, Space Heaters, Furnaces, Fireplaces)
Key Signs/Symptoms
- dizziness or headache
- confusion
- nausea/emesis
- fatigue
- tachycardia
- eye and upper respiratory tract irritation
- wheezing/bronchial constriction
- persistent cough
- elevated blood carboxyhemoglobin levels
- increased frequency of angina in persons with coronary heart disease
Diagnostic Leads
- What types of combustion equipment are present, including gas
furnaces or water heaters, stoves, unvented gas or kerosene space
heaters, clothes dryers, fireplaces? Are vented appliances properly
vented to the outside?
- Are household members exhibiting influenza-like symptoms during the
heating season? Are they complaining of nausea, watery eyes, coughing,
headaches?
- Is a gas oven or range used as a home heating source?
- Is the individual aware of odor when a heat source is in use?
- Is heating equipment in disrepair or misused? When was it last
professionally inspected?
- Does structure have an attached or underground garage where motor
vehicles may idle?
- Is charcoal being burned indoors in a hibachi, grill, or fireplace?
Remedial Action
Periodic professional inspection and maintenance of
installed equipment such as furnaces, water heaters, and clothes dryers
are recommended. Such equipment should be vented directly to the outdoors.
Fireplace and wood or coal stove flues should be regularly cleaned and
inspected before each heating season. Kitchen exhaust fans should be
exhausted to outside. Vented appliances should be used whenever possible.
Charcoal should never be burned inside. Individuals potentially exposed to
combustion sources should consider installing carbon monoxide detectors
that meet the requirements of Underwriters Laboratory (UL) Standard 2034.
No detector is 100% reliable, and some individuals may experience health
problems at levels of carbon monoxide below the detection sensitivity of
these devices.
Comment
Aside from environmental tobacco smoke, the major
combustion pollutants that may be present at harmful levels in the home or
workplace stem chiefly from malfunctioning heating devices, or
inappropriate, inefficient use of such devices. Incidents are largely
seasonal. Another source may be motor vehicle emissions due, for example,
to proximity to a garage (or a loading dock located near air intake
vents).
A variety of particulates, acting as additional irritants
or, in some cases, carcinogens, may also be released in the course of
combustion. Although faulty venting in office buildings and other
nonresidential structures has resulted in combustion product problems,
most cases involve the home or non-work-related consumer activity. Among
possible sources of contaminants: gas ranges that are malfunctioning or
used as heat sources; improperly flued or vented fireplaces, furnaces,
wood or coal stoves, gas water heaters and gas clothes dryers; and
unvented or otherwise improperly used kerosene or gas space heaters.
The gaseous pollutants from combustion sources include
some identified as prominent atmospheric pollutants -- carbon monoxide
(CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and sulfur
dioxide (SO2).
Carbon monoxide is an
asphyxiant. An accumulation of this odorless, colorless gas may result in
a varied constellation of symptoms deriving from the compound's affinity
for and combination with hemoglobin, forming carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) and
disrupting oxygen transport. The elderly, the fetus, and persons with
cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases are particularly sensitive to
elevated CO levels. Methylene chloride, found in some common household
products, such as paint strippers, can be metabolized to form carbon
monoxide which combines with hemoglobin to form COHb. The following chart
shows the relationship between CO concentrations and COHb levels in blood.
Tissues with the highest oxygen needs -- myocardium,
brain, and exercising muscle -- are the first affected. Symptoms may mimic
influenza and include fatigue, headache, dizziness, nausea and vomiting,
cognitive impairment, and tachycardia. Retinal hemorrhage on funduscopic
examination is an important diagnostic sign19, but COHb must be
present before this finding can be made, and the diagnosis is not
exclusive. Studies involving controlled exposure have also shown that CO
exposure shortens time to the onset of angina in exercising individuals
with ischemic heart disease and decreases exercise tolerance in those with
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)20.
Note: Since CO poisoning can mimic influenza, the health
care provider should be suspicious when an entire family exhibits such
symptoms at the start of the heating season and symptoms persist with
medical treatment and time.
 |
|
Relationship between
carbon monoxide (CO) concentrations and carboxyhemoglobin (COHb)
levels in blood
Predicted COHb levels resulting from 1- and 8-hour exposures
to carbon monoxide at rest (10 l/min) and with light exercise (20
l/min) are based on the Coburn-Foster-Kane equation using the
following assumed parameters for nonsmoking adults: altitude = 0
ft; initial COHb level = 0.5%; Haldane constant = 218; blood
volume = 5.5 l; hemoglobin level = 15 g/100ml; lung diffusivity =
30 ml/torr/min; endogenous rate = 0.007 ml/min.
Source: Raub, J.A. and Grant, L.D. 1989. "Critical health
issues associated with review of the scientific criteria for
carbon monoxide." Presented at the 82nd Annual Meeting of the
Air Waste Management Association. June 25-30. Anaheim, CA. Paper
No. 89.54.1, Used with permission. |
Carboxyhemoglobin levels and related health effects
| % COHb in blood |
Effects Assocated with this COHb
Level |
| 80 |
Deatha |
| 60 |
Loss of consciousness; death if
exposure continuesa |
| 40 |
Confusion; collapse on exercisea |
| 30 |
Headache; fatigue; impaired judgementa |
| 7-20 |
Statistically significant decreased
maximal oxygen consumption during strenuous exercise in healthy
young menb |
| 5-17 |
Statistically significant diminution
of visual perception, manual dexterity, ability to learn, or
performance in complex sensorimotor tasks (such as driving)b |
| 5-5.5 |
Statistically significant decreased
maximal oxygen consumption and exercise time during strenuous
exercise in young healthy menb |
| Below 5 |
No statistically significant vigilance
decrements after exposure to COb |
| 2.9-4.5 |
Statistically significant decreased
exercise capacity (i.e., shortened duration of exercise before
onset of pain) in patients with angina pectoris and increased
duration of angina attacksb |
| 2.3-4.3 |
Statistically significant decreased
(about 3-7%) work time to exhaustion in exercising healthy menb |
SOURCE: aU.S. EPA (1979); bU.S. EPA
(1985)
Nitrogen dioxide (NO) and sulfur
dioxide (SO2) act mainly as irritants,
affecting the mucosa of the eyes, nose, throat, and respiratory tract.
Acute S02-related bronchial constriction
may also occur in people with asthma or as a hypersensitivity reaction.
Extremely high-dose exposure (as in a building fire) to N02
may result in pulmonary edema and diffuse lung injury. Continued exposure
to high N02 levels can contribute to the
development of acute or chronic bronchitis.
The relatively low water solubility of N02
results in minimal mucous membrane irritation of the upper airway. The
principal site of toxicity is the lower respiratory tract. Recent studies
indicate that low-level N02 exposure may
cause increased bronchial reactivity in some asthmatics, decreased lung
function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and an
increased risk of respiratory infections, especially in young children.
The high water solubility of S02
causes it to be extremely irritating to the eyes and upper respiratory
tract. Concentrations above six parts per million produce mucous membrane
irritation. Epidemiologic studies indicate that chronic exposure to S02
is associated with increased respiratory symptoms and decrements in
pulmonary function21. Clinical studies have found that some
asthmatics respond with bronchoconstriction to even brief exposure to S02
levels as low as 0.4 parts per million22.
Key Signs/Symptoms
- recognized infectious disease
- exacerbation of asthma
- rhinitis
- conjunctival inflammation
- recurrent fever
- malaise
- dyspnea
- chest tightness
- cough
Diagnostic Leads
Infectious disease:
- Is the case related to the workplace, home, or other location?
(Note: It is difficult to associate a single case of any infectious
disease with a specific site of exposure.)
- Does the location have a reservoir or disseminator of biologicals
that may logically lead to exposure?
Hypersensitivity disease:
- Is the relative humidity in the home or workplace consistently above
50 percent?
- Are humidifiers or other water-spray systems in use? How often are
they cleaned? Are they cleaned appropriately?
- Has there been flooding or leaks?
- Is there evidence of mold growth (visible growth or odors)?
- Are organic materials handled in the workplace?
- Is carpet installed on unventilated concrete (e.g., slab on grade)
floors?
- Are there pets in the home?
- Are there problems with cockroaches or rodents?
Toxicosis and/or irritation:
- Is adequate outdoor air being provided?
- Is the relative humidity in the home or workplace above 50 percent
or below 30 percent?
- Are humidifiers or other water-spray systems in use?
- Is there evidence of mold growth (visible growth or odors)?
- Are bacterial odors present (fishy or locker-room smells)?
Remedial Action
Provide adequate outdoor air ventilation to dilute human
source aerosols.
Keep equipment water reservoirs clean and potable water
systems adequately chlorinated, according to manufacturer instructions. Be
sure there is no standing water in air conditioners. Maintain humidifiers
and dehumidifiers according to manufacturer instructions.
Repair leaks and seepage. Thoroughly clean and dry
water-damaged carpets and building materials within 24 hours of damage, or
consider removal and replacement.
Keep relative humidity below 50 percent. Use exhaust fans
in bathrooms and kitchens, and vent clothes dryers to outside.
Control exposure to pets.
Vacuum carpets and upholstered furniture regularly. Note:
While it is important to keep an area as dust-free as possible, cleaning
activities often re-suspend fine particles during and immediately after
the activity. Sensitive individuals should be cautioned to avoid such
exposure, and have others perform the vacuuming, or use a commercially
available HEPA (High Efficiency Particulate Air) filtered vacuum.
Cover mattresses. Wash bedding and soft toys frequently in
water at a temperature above 130oF to kill dust mites.
Comment
Biological air pollutants are found to some degree in
every home, school, and workplace. Sources include outdoor air and human
occupants who shed viruses and bacteria, animal occupants (insects and
other arthropods, mammals) that shed allergens, and indoor surfaces and
water reservoirs where fungi and bacteria can grow, such as humidifiers23.
A number of factors allow biological agents to grow and be released into
the air. Especially important is high relative humidity, which encourages
house dust mite populations to increase and allows fungal growth on damp
surfaces. Mite and fungus contamination can be caused by flooding,
continually damp carpet (which may occur when carpet is installed on
poorly ventilated concrete floors), inadequate exhaust of bathrooms, or
kitchen-generated moisture24. Appliances such as humidifiers,
dehumidifiers, air conditioners, and drip pans under cooling coils (as in
refrigerators), support the growth of bacteria and fungi.
Components of mechanical heating, ventilating, and air
conditioning (HVAC) systems may also serve as reservoirs or sites of
microbial amplification25. These include air intakes near
potential sources of contamination such as standing water, organic debris
or bird droppings, or integral parts of the mechanical system itself, such
as various humidification systems, cooling coils, or condensate drain
pans. Dust and debris may be deposited in the duct work or mixing boxes of
the air handler.
Biological agents in indoor air are known to cause three
types of human disease: infections, where pathogens invade human tissues;
hypersensitivity diseases, where specific activation of the immune system
causes disease; and toxicosis, where biologically produced chemical toxins
cause direct toxic effects. In addition, exposure to conditions conducive
to biological contamination (e.g., dampness, water damage) has been
related to nonspecific upper and lower respiratory symptoms. Evidence is
available that shows that some episodes of the group of nonspecific
symptoms known as "sick building syndrome" may be related to
microbial contamination in buildings26.
The transmission of airborne infectious diseases is
increased where there is poor indoor air quality27,28. The
rising incidence of tuberculosis is at least in part a problem associated
with crowding and inadequate ventilation. Evidence is increasing that
inadequate or inappropriately designed ventilation systems in health care
settings or other crowded conditions with high-risk populations can
increase the risk of exposure29.
The incidence of tuberculosis began to rise in the mid
1980s, after a steady decline. The 1989 increase of 4.7 percent to a total
of 23,495 cases in the United States was the largest since national
reporting of the disease began in 1953, and the number of cases has
continued to increase each year30. Fresh air ventilation is an
important factor in contagion control. Such procedures as sputum induction
and collection, bronchoscopy, and aerosolized pentamidine treatments in
persons who may be at risk for tuberculosis (e.g., AIDS patients) should
be carried out in negative air pressure areas, with air exhausted directly
to the outside and away from intake sources31. Unfortunately,
many health care facilities are not so equipped. Properly installed and
maintained ultraviolet irradiation, particularly of upper air levels in an
indoor area, is also a useful means of disinfection32.
A disease associated with indoor air contamination is
Legionnaires' Disease, a pneumonia that primarily attacks exposed people
over 50 years old, especially those who are immunosuppressed, smoke, or
abuse alcohol. Exposure to especially virulent strains can also cause the
disease in other susceptible populations. The case fatality rate is high,
ranging from five to 25 percent. Erythromycin is the most effective
treatment. The agent, Legionella pneumophila, has been found in
association with cooling systems, whirlpool baths, humidifiers, food
market vegetable misters, and other sources, including residential tap
water33. This bacterium or a closely related strain also causes
a self-limited (two- to five-day), flu-like illness without pneumonia,
sometimes called Pontiac Fever, after a 1968 outbreak in that Michigan
city.
A major concern associated with exposure to biological
pollutants is allergic reactions, which range from rhinitis, nasal
congestion, conjunctival inflammation, and urticaria to asthma. Notable
triggers for these diseases are allergens derived from house dust mites;
other arthropods, including cockroaches; pets (cats, dogs, birds,
rodents); molds; and protein-containing furnishings, including feathers,
kapok, etc. In occupational settings, more unusual allergens (e.g.,
bacterial enzymes, algae) have caused asthma epidemics. Probably most
proteins of non-human origin can cause asthma in a subset of any
appropriately exposed population34.
The role of mites as a source of house dust allergens has
been known for 20 years34,35. It is now possible to measure
mite allergens in the environment and IgE antibody levels in patients
using readily available techniques and standardized protocols. Experts
have proposed provisional standards for levels of mite allergens in dust
that lead to sensitization and symptoms. A risk level where chronic
exposure may cause sensitization is 2µg Der pI (Dermatophagoides
pteronysinus allergen I) per gram of dust (or 100 mites /g or 0.6 mg
guanine /g of dust). A risk level for acute asthma in mite-allergic
individuals is 10µg (Der pI) of the allergen per gram of dust (or 500
mites /g of dust).
Controlling house dust mite infestation includes covering
mattresses, hot washing of bedding, and removing carpet from bedrooms. For
mite allergic individuals, it is recommended that home relative humidities
be lower than 45 percent. Mites desiccate in drier air (absolute
humidities below 7 kg.). Vacuum cleaning and use of acaricides can be
effective short-term remedial strategies. One such acaracide, Acarosan, is
registered with EPA to treat carpets, furniture, and beds for dust mites.
Another class of hypersensitivity disease is
hypersensitivity pneumonitis, which may include humidifier fever.
Hypersensitivity pneumonitis, also called allergic alveo-litis, is a
granulomatous interstitial lung disease caused by exposure to airborne
antigens. It may affect from one to five percent or more of a specialized
population exposed to appropriate antigens (e.g., farmers and farmers'
lung, pigeon breeders and pigeon breeders' disease)37.
Continued antigen exposure may lead to end-stage pulmonary fibrosis.
Hypersensitivity pneumonitis is frequently misdiagnosed as a pneumonia of
infectious etiology. The prevalence of hypersensitivity pneumonitis in the
general population is unknown.
Outbreaks of hypersensitivity pneumonitis in office
buildings have been traced to air conditioning and humidification systems
contaminated with bacteria and molds38. In the home,
hypersensitivity pneumonitis is often caused by contaminated humidifiers
or by pigeon or pet bird antigens. The period of sensitization before a
reaction occurs may be as long as months or even years. Acute symptoms,
which occur four to six hours postexposure and recur on challenge with the
offending agent, include cough, dyspnea, chills, myalgia, fatigue, and
high fever. Nodules and nonspecific infiltrates may be noted on chest
films. The white blood cell count is elevated, as is specific IgG to the
offending antigen. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis generally responds to
corticosteroids or cessation of exposure (either keeping symptomatic
people out of contaminated environments or removing the offering agents).
Humidifier fever is a disease of uncertain etiology39.
It shares symptoms with hypersensitivity pneumonitis, but the high attack
rate and short-term effects may indicate that toxins (e.g., bacterial
endotoxins) are involved. Onset occurs a few hours after exposure. It is a
flu-like illness marked by fever, headache, chills, myalgia, and malaise
but without prominent pulmonary symptoms. It normally subsides within 24
hours without residual effects, and a physician is rarely consulted.
Humidifier fever has been related to exposure to amoebae, bacteria, and
fungi found in humidifier reservoirs, air conditioners, and aquaria. The
attack rate within a workplace may be quite high, sometimes exceeding 25
percent.
Bacterial and fungal organisms can be emitted from
impeller (cool mist) and ultrasonic humidifiers. Mesophilic fungi,
thermophilic bacteria, and thermophilic actinomycetes -- all of which are
associated with development of allergic responses -- have been isolated
from humidifiers built into the forced-air heating system as well as
separate console units. Airborne concentrations of microorganisms are
noted during operation and might be quite high for individuals using
ultrasonic or cool mist units. Drying and chemical disinfection with
bleach or 3% hydrogen peroxide solution are effective remedial measures
over a short period, but cannot be considered as reliable maintenance.
Only rigorous, daily, and end-of-season cleaning regimens, coupled with
disinfection, have been shown to be effective. Manual cleaning of
contaminated reservoirs can cause exposure to allergens and pathogens.
Another class of agents that may cause disease related to
indoor airborne exposure is the mycotoxins. These agents are fungal
metabolites that have toxic effects ranging from short-term irritation to
immunosuppression and cancer. Virtually all the information related to
diseases caused by mycotoxins concerns ingestion of contaminated food40.
However, mycotoxins are contained in some kinds of fungus spores, and
these can enter the body through the respiratory tract. At least one case
of neurotoxic symptoms possibly related to airborne mycotoxin exposure in
a heavily contaminated environment has been reported41. Skin is
another potential route of exposure to mycotoxins. Toxins of several fungi
have caused cases of severe dermatosis. In view of the serious nature of
the toxic effects reported for mycotoxins, exposure to mycotoxin-producing
agents should be minimized.
Health Problems Caused By
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
(Formaldehyde, Pesticides, Solvents, Cleaning Agents)
Key Signs/Symptoms
- conjunctival irritation
- nose, throat discomfort
- headache
- allergic skin reaction
- dyspnea
- declines in serum cholinesterase levels
- nausea, emesis
- epistaxis (formaldehyde)
- fatigue
- dizziness
Diagnostic Leads
- Does the individual reside in mobile home or new conventional home
containing large amounts of pressed wood products?
- Has individual recently acquired new pressed wood furniture?
- Does the individual's job or avocational pursuit include clerical,
craft, graphics, or photographic materials?
- Are chemical cleaners used extensively in the home, school, or
workplace?
- Has remodeling recently been done in home, school or workplace?
- Has individual recently used pesticides, paints, or solvents?
Remedial Action
Increase ventilation when using products that emit
volatile organic compounds, and meet or exceed any label precautions. Do
not store opened containers of unused paints and similar materials within
home or office. See special note on pesticides.
Formaldehyde is one of the best known volatile organic
compound (VOC) pollutants, and is one of the few indoor air pollutants
that can be readily measured. Identify, and if possible, remove the source
if formaldehyde is the potential cause of the problem. If not possible,
reduce exposure: use polyurethane or other sealants on cabinets, paneling
and other furnishings. To be effective, any such coating must cover all
surfaces and edges and remain intact. Formaldehyde is also used in
permanent press fabric and mattress ticking. Sensitive individuals may
choose to avoid these products.
Comment
At room temperature, volatile organic compounds are
emitted as gases from certain solids or liquids. VOCs include a variety of
chemicals (e.g., formaldehyde, benzene, perchloroethylene), some of which
may have short- and long-term effects. Concentrations of many VOCs are
consistently higher indoors than outdoors. A study by the EPA, covering
six communities in various parts of the United States, found indoor levels
up to ten times higher than those outdoors -- even in locations with
significant outdoor air pollution sources, such as petrochemical plants42.
A wide array of volatile organics are emitted by products
used in home, office, school, and arts/crafts and hobby activities. These
products, which number in the thousands, include:
- personal items such as scents and hair sprays;
- household products such as finishes, rug and oven cleaners, paints
and lacquers (and their thinners), paint strippers, pesticides (see
below);
- dry-cleaning fluids;
- building materials and home furnishings;
- office equipment such as some copiers and printers;
- office products such as correction fluids and carbonless copy paper43,44;
- graphics and craft materials including glues and adhesives,
permanent markers, and photographic solutions.
Many of these items carry precautionary labels specifying
risks and procedures for safe use; some do not. Signs and symptoms of VOC
exposure may include eye and upper respiratory irritation, rhinitis, nasal
congestion, rash, pruritus, headache, nausea, vomiting, dyspnea and, in
the case of formaldehyde vapor, epistaxis.
Formaldehyde has been classified as a probable human
carcinogen by the EPA45. Urea-formaldehyde foam insulation
(UFFI), one source of formaldehyde used in home construction until the
early 1980s, is now seldom installed, but formaldehyde-based resins are
components of finishes, plywood, paneling, fiberboard, and particleboard,
all widely employed in mobile and conventional home construction as
building materials (subflooring, paneling) and as components of furniture
and cabinets, permanent press fabric, draperies, and mattress ticking.
Airborne formaldehyde acts as an irritant to the
conjunctiva and upper and lower respiratory tract. Symptoms are temporary
and, depends upon the level and length of exposure, may range from burning
or tingling sensations in eyes, nose, and throat to chest tightness and
wheezing. Acute, severe reactions to formaldehyde vapor -- which has a
distinctive, pungent odor -- may be associated with hypersensitivity. It
is estimated that 10 to 20 percent of the U.S. population, including
asthmatics, may have hyperreactive airways which may make them more
susceptible to formaldehyde's effects46.
Pesticides sold for household use, notably impregnated
strips, and foggers or "bombs", which are technically classed as
semivolatile organic compounds, include a variety of chemicals in various
forms. Exposure to pesticides may cause harm if they are used improperly.
However, exposure to pesticides via inhalation of spray mists may occur
during normal use. Exposure can also occur via inhalation of vapors and
contaminated dusts after use (particularly to children who may be in close
contact with contaminated surfaces). Symptoms may include headache,
dizziness, muscular weakness, and nausea. In addition, some pesticide
active ingredients and inert components are considered possible human
carcinogens. Label directions must be explicitly followed47.
Key Signs/Symptoms of
Lead Poisoning in Adults...
- gastrointestinal discomfort/constipation/anorexia/nausea
- fatigue, weakness
- personality changes
- headache
- hearing loss
- tremor, lack of coordination
... and in Infants and Small Children
- irritability
- abdominal pain
- ataxia
- seizures/ loss of consciousness
- (chronic) learning deficits
- hyperactivity, reduced attention span
Key Signs/Symptoms of Mercury Poisoning
- muscle cramps or tremors
- headache
- tachycardia
- intermittent fever
- acrodynia
- personality change
- neurological dysfunction
Diagnostic Leads
- Does the family reside in old or restored housing?
- Has renovation work been conducted in the home, workplace, school,
or day care facility?
- Is the home located near a busy highway or industrial area?
- Does the individual work with lead materials such as solder or
automobile radiators?
- Does the child have sibling, friend, or classmate recently diagnosed
with lead poisoning?
- Has the individual engaged in art, craft, or workshop pursuits?
- Does the individual regularly handle firearms?
- Has the home interior recently been painted with latex paint that
may contain mercury?
- Does the individual use mercury in religious or cultural activities?
Remedial Action
Wet-mop and wipe furniture frequently to control lead
dust. Have professional remove or encapsulate lead containing paint;
individuals involved in this and other high exposure activities should use
appropriate protective gear and work in well-ventilated areas. Do not burn
painted or treated wood.
Comment
Most health professionals are aware of the threat of lead
(Pb) toxicity, particularly its long term impact on children in the form
of cognitive and developmental deficits which are often cumulative and
subtle. Such deficits may persist into adulthood48. According
to the American Academy of Pediatrics, an estimated three to four million
children in the U.S. under age six have blood lead levels that could cause
impaired development, and an additional 400,000 fetuses are at similar
risk49.
Lead toxicity may alternatively present as acute illness.
Signs and symptoms in children may include irritability, abdominal pain,
emesis, marked ataxia, and seizures or loss of consciousness. In adults,
diffuse complaints -- including headache, nausea, anorexia (and weight
loss), constipation, fatigue, personality changes, and hearing loss --
coupled with exposure opportunity may lead to suspicion of lead poisoning.
Lead inhibits heme synthesis. Since interruption of that
process produces protoporphyrin accumulation at the cellular level, the
standard screening method is investigation of blood lead (PbB) levels
which reveal recent exposure to lead. Acute symptomology in adults is
often associated with PbB at levels of 40 g/ dl or higher. There is good
evidence for adverse effects of lead in very young children at much lower
levels.50,51 The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has
set 10 g/ dl as the level of concern52. Increased maternal Pb
exposure has also been deemed significant in pregnancy, since an umbilical
cord PbB of greater than 10 g/ dl has been correlated with early
developmental deficits. If sufficiently high PbB levels are confirmed,
chelation therapy may be indicated. Suspected low level lead contamination
cannot be accurately identified by a erythrocyte protoporphyrin (EP)
finger-stick test, but requires blood lead analysis.
Lead poisoning via ingestion has been most widely
publicized, stressing the roles played by nibbling of flaking paint by
infants and toddlers and by the use of lead-containing foodware (glass,
and soldered metal-ceramic ware) by adults. Lead dust flaking or
"chalking" off lead painted walls generated by friction surfaces
is a major concern. Airborne lead, however, is also a worrisome source of
toxicity. There is no skin absorption associated with inorganic lead.
Airborne lead outdoors, originating chiefly from gasoline
additives, has been effectively controlled since the 1980s through
regulation at the federal level. Much of this lead still remains in the
soil near heavily trafficked highways and in urban areas, however, and can
become airborne at times. It may enter dwellings via windows and doors,
and contaminated soil can also be tracked inside.
Indoors, the chief source is paint. Lead levels in paints
for interior use have been increasingly restricted since the 1950s, and
many paints are now virtually lead free. But older housing and furniture
may still be coated with leaded paint, sometimes surfacing only after
layers of later, non-lead paint have flaked away or have been stripped
away in the course of restoration or renovation. In these circumstances,
lead dust and fumes can permeate the air breathed by both adults and
children.
Additional sources of airborne lead include art and craft
materials, from which lead is not banned, but the U.S. Consumer Product
Safety Commission (CPSC) requires its presence to be declared on the
product label if it is present in toxic amounts. Significant quantities
are found in many paints and glazes, stained glass, as well as in some
solder. Hazardous levels of atmospheric lead have been found at police and
civilian firing ranges. Repair and cleaning of automobile radiators in
inadequately ventilated premises can expose workers to perilous levels of
airborne lead. The use of treated or painted wood in fireplaces or
improperly vented wood stoves may release a variety of substances,
including lead and other heavy metals, into the air.
While old paint has been the most publicized source of
airborne heavy metal (i.e., lead), new paint has emerged as a concern as
well. A 1990 report detailed elevated levels of mercury in persons exposed
to interior latex (water-based) paint containing phenylmercuric acetate
(PMA)53. PMA was a preservative that was used to prolong the
product's shelf life.
Initial action by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
resulted in the elimination of mercury compounds from indoor latex paints
at the point of manufacture as of August 1990, with the requirement that
paints containing mercury, including existing stocks originally designed
for indoor use, be labeled or relabeled "For Exterior Use Only".
As of September 1991, phenylmercuric acetate is forbidden in the
manufacture of exterior latex paints as well. Latex paints containing
hazardous levels of mercury may still remain on store shelves or in homes
where they were left over after initial use, however.
An additional matter of concern, recently noted by the
CPSC, is the sprinkling of mercury about the home by some ethnic/religious
groups54. According to the CPSC, mercury for this purpose is
purveyed by some herbal medicine or botanical shops to consumers unaware
of the dangers of the substance.
Key Signs/Symptoms
- lethargy or fatigue
- headache, dizziness, nausea
- irritation of mucous membranes
- sensitivity to odors
Diagnostic Leads
- Are problems temporally related to time spent in a particular
building or part of a building?
- Do symptoms resolve when the individual is not in the building?
- Do symptoms recur seasonally (heating, cooling)?
- Have co-workers, peers noted similar complaints?
Remedial Action
Appropriate persons -- employer, building owner or
manager, building investigation specialist, if necessary state and local
government agency medical epidemiologists and other public health
officials -- should undertake investigation and analysis of the implicated
building, particularly the design and operation of HVAC systems, and
correct contributing conditions. Persistence on the part of individual(s)
and health care consultant(s) may be required to diagnose and remediate
the building problems.
Comment
The term "sick building syndrome" (SBS), first
employed in the 1970s, describes a situation in which reported symptoms
among a population of building occupants can be temporally associated with
their presence in that building. Typically, though not always, the
structure is an office building.
Generally, a spectrum of specific and nonspecific
complaints are involved. Typical complaints, in addition to the signs and
symptoms already listed, may also include eye and/or nasopharyngeal
irritation, rhinitis or nasal congestion, inability to concentrate, and
general malaise-complaints suggestive of a host of common ailments, some
ubiquitous and easily communicable. The key factors are commonality of
symptoms and absence of symptoms among building occupants when the
individuals are not in the building.
Sick building syndrome should be suspected when a
substantial proportion of those spending extended time in a building (as
in daily employment) report or experience acute on-site discomfort. If is
important, however, to distinguish SBS from problems of building related
illness. The latter term is reserved for situations in which signs and
symptoms of diagnosable illness are identified and can be attributed
directly to specific airborne building contaminants. Legionnaires' Disease
and hypersensitivity pneumonitis, for example, are building related
illnesses.
There has been extensive speculation about the cause or
causes of SBS. Poor design, maintenance, and/or operation of the
structure's ventilation system may be at fault55. The
ventilation system itself can be a source of irritants. Interior redesign,
such as the rearrangement of offices or installation of partitions, may
also interfere with efficient functioning of such systems.
Another theory suggests that very low levels of specific
pollutants, including some discussed in the preceding pages, may be
present and may act synergistically, or at least in combination, to cause
health effects. Humidity may also be a factor: while high relative
humility may contribute to biological pollutant problems, an unusually low
level -- below 20 or 30 percent -- may heighten the effects of mucosal
irritants and may even prove irritating itself. Other contributing
elements may include poor lighting and adverse ergonomic conditions,
temperature extremes, noise, and psychological stresses that may have both
individual and interpersonal impact.
The prevalence of the problem is unknown. A 1984 World
Health Organization report suggested that as many as 30 percent of new and
remodeled buildings worldwide may generate excessive complaints related to
indoor air quality56. In a nationwide, random sampling of U.S.
office workers, 24 percent perceived air quality problems in their work
environments, and 20 percent believed their work performance was hampered
thereby57.
When SBS is suspected, the individual physician or other
health care provider may need to join forces with others (e.g., clinicians
consulted by an individual's co-workers, as well as industrial hygienists
and public health officials) to adequately investigate the problem and
develop appropriate solutions.
Asbestos and radon are among the most publicized indoor
air pollutants. Both are known human carcinogens. Their carcinogenic
effects are not immediate but are evident only years, even decades, after
prolonged exposure.
Once widely used in structural fireproofing, asbestos may
be found predominantly in heating systems and acoustic insulation, in
floor and ceiling tiles, and in shingles in many older houses. It was
formerly used in such consumer products as fireplace gloves, ironing board
covers, and certain hair dryers.
When asbestos-containing material is damaged or
disintegrates with age, microscopic fibers may be dispersed into the air.
Over as long as twenty, thirty, or more years, the presence of these
fibers within the lungs may result in asbestosis (asbestos-caused fibrosis
of the lung, seen as a result of heavy occupational exposure)58,
lung cancer and pleural or peritoneal cancer, or mesothelioma59.
For lung cancer, the effect of tobacco smoking in combination with
asbestos exposure appears to be synergistic by approximately fivefold60.
Occupational exposure may also be associated with increased risk of
gastrointestinal malignancies. Attention should be focused on those
populations with continual exposure and documented health effects, e.g.
maintenance workers.
Products and materials containing asbestos are not
necessarily so labeled. Construction professionals or state or local
environmental agencies may inspect and analyze suspect materials.
Manufacturers of particular products may also be able to supply
information.
The risk of disease depends on exposure to airborne
asbestos fibers. Average levels in buildings are low, and the risk to
building occupants is therefore low.
Removal of asbestos is not always the best choice to
reduce exposure. The EPA requires asbestos removal only in order to
prevent significant public exposure and generally recommends an in-place
management program when asbestos has been discovered and is in good
condition61.
Radon is the second leading cause of lung cancer,
following smoking. Radon is odorless, colorless, and tasteless. It is a
naturally occurring radioactive gas resulting from the decay of radium,
itself a decay product of uranium. Radon in turn breaks down into radon
decay products, short-lived radionuclides. These decay products, either
free or attached to airborne particles, are inhaled, and further decay can
take place in the lungs before removal by clearance mechanisms.
It is the emission of high-energy alpha particles during
the radon decay process that increases the risk of lung cancer. While the
risk to underground miners has long been known, the potential danger of
residential radon pollution has been widely recognized only since the late
1970s, with the documentation of high indoor levels.
When radon decay products are inhaled and deposited in the
lungs, the alpha emissions penetrate the cells of the epithelium lining
the lung. Energy deposited in these cells during irradiation is believed
to initiate the process of carcinogenesis. The EPA, the National Cancer
Institute, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and others
estimate that thousands of lung cancer deaths per year are attributable to
radon, based on data from epidemiologic studies of thousands of
underground miners and from animal studies. Lung cancer is presently the
only commonly accepted disease risk associated with radon.
Tobacco smoke in combination with radon exposure has a
synergistic effect. Smokers and former smokers are believed to be at
especially high risk. Scientists estimate that the increased risk of lung
cancer to smokers from radon exposure is ten to twenty times higher than
to people who have never smoked.
The EPA estimates that as many as six million homes
throughout the country have elevated levels of radon. Since 1988, EPA and
the Office of the Surgeon General have recommended that homes below the
third floor be tested for radon.
Short term testing is the quickest way to determine if a
potential problem exists, taking from two to ninety days to complete.
Low-cost radon test kits are available by mail order, in hardware stores,
and through other retail outlets62.
Measurement devices should be state-certified or display
the phrase, "Meets EPA Requirements". Trained contractors who
meet EPA's requirements can also provide testing services. The most
commonly used devices are charcoal canisters, electret ion detectors,
alpha track detectors, and continuous monitors placed by contractors.
Short term testing should be conducted in the lowest lived in area of the
home, with the doors and windows shut. Long term testing can take up to a
full year but is more likely to reflect the home's year round average
radon level than short term testing. Alpha track detectors and electret
ion detectors are the most common long-term testing devices.
Corrective steps include sealing foundation cracks and
holes, and venting radon-laden air from beneath the foundation.
Professional expertise should be sought for effective execution of these
measures.
The subject of indoor air pollution is not without some
controversy. Indoor air quality is an evolving issue; it is important to
keep informed about continuing developments in this area. The following
questions may be asked of physicians and other health professionals.
The diagnostic label of multiple chemical sensitivity
(MCS) -- also referred to as "chemical hypersensitivity" or
"environmental illness" -- is being applied increasingly,
although definition of the phenomenon is elusive and its pathogenesis as a
distinct entity is not confirmed. Multiple chemical sensitivity has become
more widely known and increasingly controversial as more patients receive
the label63.
Persons with the diagnostic label of multiple chemical
sensitivity are said to suffer multi-system illness as a result of contact
with, or proximity to, a spectrum of substances, including airborne
agents. These may include both recognized pollutants discussed earlier
(such as tobacco smoke, formaldehyde, et al.) and other pollutants
ordinarily considered innocuous. Some who espouse the concept of MCS
believe that it may explain such chronic conditions as some forms of
arthritis and colitis, in addition to generally recognized types of
hypersensitivity reactions.
Some practitioners believe that the condition has a purely
psychological basis. One study63 reported a 65 percent
incidence of current or past clinical depression, anxiety disorders, or
somatoform disorders in subjects with this diagnosis compared with 28
percent in controls. Others, however, counter that the disorder itself may
cause such problems64, since those affected are no longer able
to lead a normal life, or that these conditions stem from effects on the
nervous system65.
The current consensus is that in cases of claimed or
suspected MCS, complaints should not be dismissed as psychogenic, and a
thorough workup is essential. Primary care givers should determine that
the individual does not have an underlying physiological problem and
should consider the value of consultation with allergists and other
specialists.
"Clinical ecology", while not a recognized
conventional medical specialty, has drawn the attention of health care
professionals as well as laypersons. The organization of clinical
ecologists-physicians who treat individuals believed to be suffering from
"total allergy" or "multiple chemical sensitivity" --
was founded as the Society for Clinical Ecology and is now known as the
American Academy of Environmental Medicine. Its ranks have attracted
allergists and physicians from other traditional medical specialties66.
Ion generators act by charging the particles in a room so
that they are attracted to walls, floors, tabletops, draperies, occupants,
etc. Abrasion can result in these particles being resuspended into the
air. In some cases these devices contain a collector to attract the
charged particles back to the unit. While ion generators may remove small
particles (e.g., those in tobacco smoke) from the indoor air, they do not
remove gases or odors, and may be relatively ineffective in removing large
particles such as pollen and house dust allergens. Although some have
suggested that these devices provide a benefit by rectifying a
hypothesized ion imbalance, no controlled studies have confirmed this
effect.
Ozone, a lung irritant, is produced indirectly by ion
generators and some other electronic air cleaners and directly by ozone
generators. While indirect ozone production is of concern, there is even
greater concern with the direct, and purposeful introduction of a lung
irritant into indoor air. There is no difference, despite some marketers'
claims, between ozone in smog outdoors and ozone produced by these
devices. Under certain use conditions ion generators and other
ozone
generating air cleaners can produce levels of this lung irritant
significantly above levels thought harmful to human health. A small
percentage of air cleaners that claim a health benefit may be regulated by
FDA as a medical device. The Food and Drug Administration has set a limit
of 0.05 parts per million of ozone for medical devices. Although ozone can
be used in reducing odors and pollutants in unoccupied spaces (such as
removing smoke odors from homes involved in fires) the levels needed to
achieve this are above those generally thought to be safe for humans.
Ion generators and ozone
generators are types of air cleaners; others include mechanical filter
air cleaners, electronic air cleaners (e.g., electrostatic precipitators),
and hybrid air cleaners utilizing two or more techniques. Generally
speaking, existing air cleaners are not appropriate single solutions to
indoor air quality problems, but can be useful as an adjunct to effective
source control and adequate ventilation. Air cleaning alone cannot
adequately remove all pollutants typically found in indoor air.
The value of any air cleaner depends upon a number of
factors, including its basic efficiency, proper selection for the type of
pollutant to be removed, proper installation in relation to the space, and
faithful maintenance. Drawbacks, varying with type, may include inadequate
pollutant removal, re-dispersement of pollutants, deceptive masking rather
than removal, generation of ozone, and unacceptable noise levels.
[At the time of this publication,] the EPA and CPSC had
not taken a position either for or against the use of these devices in the
home67. For more information on ozone generators, read the
recently released fact sheet:
Ozone
Generators That Are Sold As Air Cleaners. The purpose of this
document (which is only available via this web site) is to provide
accurate information regarding the use of ozone-generating devices in
indoor occupied spaces. This information is based on the most credible
scientific evidence currently available.
As awareness of the importance of indoor air quality
grows, more people are looking at duct cleaning as a way to solve indoor
air quality problems. Individuals considering having ducts cleaned should
determine that contaminated ducts are the cause of their health problems.
Even when contaminants are found in ducts, the source may lie elsewhere,
and cleaning ducts may not permanently solve the problem. The duct
cleaning industry is expanding to meet demand, using extensive advertising
to encourage people to use their services.
Individuals who employ such services should verify that
the service provider takes steps to protect individuals from exposure to
dislodged pollutants and chemicals used during the cleaning process. Such
steps may range from using HEPA filtration on cleaning equipment,
providing respirators for workers, and occupants vacating the premises
during cleaning.
Update: EPA has recently released the
document "Should
You Have the Air Ducts in Your Home Cleaned," EPA-402-K-97-002,
ISBN 0-16-042730-4, October 1997. You can click on the hyperlinked title
or you can order a copy of the document from IAQ INFO at 1-800-438-431
(local (703) 356-4020).
Like many other household products and furnishings, new
carpet can be a source of chemical emissions. Carpet emits volatile
organic compounds, as do products that accompany carpet installation such
as adhesives and padding. Some people report symptoms such as eye, nose
and throat irritation; headaches; skin irritations; shortness of breath or
cough; and fatigue, which they may associate with new carpet installation.
Carpet can also act as a "sink" for chemical and biological
pollutants including pesticides, dust mites, and fungi.
Individuals purchasing new carpet should ask retailers for
information to help them select lower emitting carpet, cushion, and
adhesives. Before new carpet is installed, they should ask the retailer to
unroll and air out the carpet in a clean, well-ventilated area. They
should consider leaving the premises during and immediately after carpet
installation or schedule the installation when the space is unoccupied.
Opening doors and windows and increasing the amount of fresh air indoors
will reduce exposure to most chemicals released from newly installed
carpet. During and after installation in a home, use of window fans and
room air conditioners to exhaust fumes to the outdoors is recommended.
Ventilation systems should be in proper working order, and should be
operated during installation, and for 48 to 72 hours after the new carpet
is installed.
Individuals should request that the installer follow the
Carpet and Rug Institute's installation guidelines68. If new
carpet has an objectionable odor, they should contact their carpet
retailer. Finally, carpet owners should follow the manufacturer's
instructions for proper carpet maintenance.
Recent reports in the media and promotions by the
decorative houseplant industry characterize plants as "nature's clean
air machine", claiming that National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA) research shows plants remove indoor air pollutants.
While it is true that plants remove carbon dioxide from the air, and the
ability of plants to remove certain other pollutants from water is the
basis for some pollution control methods, the ability of plants to control
indoor air pollution is less well established. Most research to date used
small chambers without any air exchange which makes extrapolation to real
world environments extremely uncertain. The only available study of the
use of plants to control indoor air pollutants in an actual building could
not determine any benefit from the use of plants69. As a
practical means of pollution control, the plant removal mechanisms appear
to be inconsequential compared to common ventilation and air exchange
rates. In other words, the ability of plants to actually improve indoor
air quality is limited in comparison with provision of adequate
ventilation.
While decorative foliage plants may be aesthetically
pleasing, it should be noted that overdamp planter soil conditions may
actually promote growth of unhealthy microorganisms.
For assistance and guidance in dealing with known or
suspected